now THAT is what we needed. emphasize policy differences, but be civil. it was a really, really good debate, and made me hopeful once again after such a nasty stretch. — PS - “Less than two hours before the 2007 fourth quarter financial filings deadline, the Romney campaign announced it had raised over $27 million. But 18 of the $27 million was loaned by Mitt Romney to the campaign, meaning that just $9 million of it was raised.” …Hahahahahahaha. filed under: misc and politics | comments: none |
Oh my god, oh my god!! – (from Awards Daily): It has been rumor up to now but TheOneRing (thanks to Susan Thea for sending in the tip) has a video that confirms, albeit in a foreign language, that yes, he will be directing The Hobbit. Guillermo Del Toro is a god among men and directors, I have always believed, and thus, I can’t imagine the collective urlgasm the web is going to have with, not to mention cinema fans everywhere. TheOneRing writes: The following YouTube video confirms that Guillermo Del Toro will be directing ‘The Hobbit’ films. UPDATE We have an additional inside source which says that the deal is NOT signed yet, however it has a 99% probability of happening. The parties are agreed and we should expect an official announcement after the WGA (Writer’s Guild of America) Strike. Our source also mentions that Howard Shore was instrumental in making this arrangement. That means we can expect Howard Shore to compose the score. (yea!) filed under: misc and movies | comments: none |
I could have told you months ago that this would happen. What an embarrassment for him; his political strategy was idiotic. He’s about to endorse John McCain today. I’m really torn, because McCain is now predicted to win the nomination by pretty much everyone. This is good because I absolutely can not stand Mitt Romney–I can’t emphasize that enough–but bad because McCain is going to be much harder for a Democrat to beat because he’s a more moderate candidate. – For Giuliani, a Dizzying Free-Fall Perhaps he was living an illusion all along. Rudolph W. Giuliani’s campaign for the Republican nomination for president took impressive wing last year, as the former mayor wove the pain experienced by his city on Sept. 11, 2001, and his leadership that followed into national celebrity. Like a best-selling author, he basked in praise for his narrative and issued ominous and often-repeated warnings about the terrorist strike next time. Voters seemed to embrace a man so comfortable wielding power, and his poll numbers edged higher to where he held a broad lead over his opponents last summer. Just three months ago, Anthony V. Carbonetti, Mr. Giuliani’s affable senior policy adviser, surveyed that field and told The New York Observer: “I don’t believe this can be taken from us. Now that I have that locked up, I can go do battle elsewhere.” In fact, Mr. Giuliani’s campaign was about to begin a free fall so precipitous as to be breathtaking. Mr. Giuliani finished third in the Florida primary on Tuesday night; only a few months earlier, he had talked about the state as his leaping-off point to winning the nomination. As Mr. Giuliani ponders his political mortality, many advisers and political observers point to the hubris and strategic miscalculations that plagued his campaign. He allowed a tight coterie of New York aides, none with national political experience, to run much of his campaign. He accumulated a fat war chest — he had $16.6 million on hand at the end of September, more than Mitt Romney ($9.5 million) or Senator John McCain ($3.2 million) — but spent vast sums on direct mail instead of building strong organizations on the ground in South Carolina and New Hampshire. Indeed, his fourth-place finish in New Hampshire, a state where he was once considered competitive, provided an early indication of his vulnerability. And, curiously, this man with the pugnacious past declined to toss more than light punches at his Republican opponents. In interviews Tuesday, even before he gave a concession speech in which he spoke of his campaign in the past tense, Mr. Giuliani described his strategic mistakes, suggesting that his opponents had built up too much momentum in earlier primaries. But this is a rhetorical sleight of hand; he in fact competed hard in New Hampshire, to remarkably poor effect. Perhaps a simpler dynamic was at work: The more that Republican voters saw of him, the less they wanted to vote for him. filed under: misc and new york city and politics | comments: none |
this is so SICK (via bbc.co.uk): Sea lions massacred in Galapagos Ecuadorean officials are investigating the slaughter of 53 sea lions from the Galapagos Islands nature reserve, which were found with their heads caved in. The dead animals included 13 pups, 25 youngsters, nine males and six females. Galapagos National Park official Victor Carrion told AFP news agency that each was killed by “a strong blow from someone”, though the motive is unknown. They had not been injured in any other way, he said, discounting the notion they had been killed for their parts. The animals were found in a state of decomposition on Pinta island, part of the archipelago which lies about 1,000km (600 miles) off the coast of Ecuador in the Pacific Ocean. The Galapagos sea lions have no natural predators on land and generally do not fear humans. Mr Carrion said no other dead animals had been discovered, but that patrols on the other islands would be increased. He added that the sea lions were a vital link in the island’s food chain and therefore any threat to them is a threat to the whole eco-system. Sea lions are sometimes hunted for their skin, or the teeth and genitals of the male animals are removed for use as a supposed aphrodisiac in Chinese medicine. World treasure In 2001 poachers killed 35 male sea lions in the archipelago, removing their genitals and teeth. However, according to Mr Carrion none of the animals killed in this latest attack had been mutilated and no cuts were found on their skin or limbs. “It was a massacre whose motives the prosecutor’s office must clarify,” Mr Carrion told AFP. The Galapagos Islands are known throughout the world as a home to unique flora and fauna, including exotic birds, marine iguana and giant tortoises. The wildlife was the inspiration for British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection. The islands were the first place on the planet officially designated as a World Heritage site, but last year the UN Environment, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco), which administers the list of sites, declared the Galapagos “in danger”. Experts said the 19 islands and surrounding ocean were under threat from “invasive species”, increased tourism and growing immigration. In a statement, the organisation said international interest in the islands - which are Ecuador’s most popular tourist attraction - was contributing to their gradual decline. filed under: misc | comments: none |
not like the oscars hold any real relevance–i never agree with them–but: GO, NO COUNTRY, GO! eight noms! —– Best motion picture: Performance by an actress in a leading role: Performance by an actor in a leading role: Performance by an actor in a supporting role: Achievement in directing: Performance by an actress in a supporting role: (more at Oscar.com) filed under: misc and movies | comments: none |
previous posts » . |